However, a new policy brief from the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) says that not only does piracy not hurt the creative industry but it is actually helping. Millions of people across the globe illegally access copyrighted material on a daily basis. The most common method of digital pirating is through torrent sites, which let an individual download and upload content through a peer-to-peer file-sharing system. Individuals in the U.S. who are found guilty of violating digital piracy laws can face severe legal penalties, including a felony record, five years in prison and $250,000 in penalties.
In the policy briefing, the authors call on governments to re-evaluate their antipiracy laws to include data from studies beyond those directly sponsored by the entertainment industry itself. In a recent interview with torrent freak, policy author Bart Canmaerts had this to say: “Contrary to the industry claims, the music industry is not in terminal decline, but still holding ground and showing healthy profits. Revenues from digital sales, subscription services, streaming and live performances compensate for the decline in revenues from the sale of CDs or records,”
In a separate story, the website TorrentFreak says that independent data actually suggests that those who pirate content are also more likely to spend their money on film, music and gaming content.
A June 2013 study found that roughly 45 percent of all Americans pirate copyrighted content on a regular basis, including 70 percent of those under 30.
In the LSE report’s key messages, the authors say that evidence does
not back up claims that individual cases of copyright infringement are
affecting entertainment industry revenues, that antipiracy laws around
the world are not achieving their desired impacts and that governments
should update their policies to include more evidence from a diverse set
of sources. “Despite the
Motion Picture Association of America’s (MPAA) claim that online piracy
is devastating the movie industry, Hollywood achieved record-breaking
global box office revenues of $35 billion in 2012, a 6% increase over
2011,” the report states.
While music sales have faced steeper declines in recent years, the
authors say those numbers have largely been balanced out by increased
sales in live performance and other outlets. “The music industry may be stagnating, but the drastic decline in
revenues warned of by the lobby associations of record labels is not in
evidence,” the authors write. Interestingly, in the same Columbia University study, which found that
nearly half of all U.S. Internet users pirate copyrighted material,
nearly half of those individuals say they would willingly pay a monthly
fee for unlimited access to multimedia content.
The LSE study authors say that is one possible solution for the
entertainment industry going forward as a way to bridge the gap between
content providers and consumers. “Within the creative industries there is a variety of views on the best
way to benefit from online sharing practices, and how to innovate to
generate revenue streams in ways that do not fit within the existing
copyright enforcement regime,” the authors conclude. “When both [the creative industries and citizens] can exploit the full
potential of the Internet, this will maximize innovative content
creation for the benefit of all stakeholders.”
I have never heard the argument that digital piracy is actually helping the entertainment industry. They actually seem to have a valid point. If you listen to somebody's songs illegally online, you probably are more likely to buy their album since you have now been exposed to the artist. So many people today have launched their careers online, and some of the illegal downloading might have helped them become more successful.
ReplyDeleteA year or two ago I remember reading an article where Ed Sheeran said that he didn't care that he was the most pirated artist in the UK because that's more ears that get to hear his music and the more likely that people would come to his shows. I've discovered a lot of new artists because of online sharing and when I discovered sites such as bearshare and limewire at a young age my music collection grew tremendously. I had music on my ipod that my friends would not have heard if I had not shared it with them. Now that I have realized the pirated music is frowned upon my Ipod is filled mostly with up and coming artists because the radio overplay mainstream artists and I like to introduce people to artists that aren't that well known.
ReplyDeleteI do not personally illegally torrent media online because I am a big fan of having a hard copy of my media. However, I think that digital piracy has its ups and downs. I do not think it is as tremendous a detriment to the music industry as some may let on, but I do think it has led to decreased sales. I disagree with the assertion that it would lead one to buy the CD that they are currently already listening to for free, because you already have it free so why pay for it again? However, I think it could lead to increased exposure of an artist so perhaps increase sales in other aspects, such as leading more people to go see performers live.
ReplyDeleteThere are many music artists out there, and there are a ton of paper view events that much be purchased in order for people to enjoy them in the comfort of their own homes. Why pirates invade the privacy of music industries and paper view events is a thing that well happen and will continue to happen unless the government in does something about it. I personally do download music on a regular basis instead of buying music cds. It saves me money in the long run. I would be willing to pay a monthly fee to make unlimited downloads of anything I like. I think this would be the only way out of this situation. I don’t really see people getting arrested for downloading music that are copywrited, I’m pretty sure there would be a lot of people. I think that a monthly fee would fix this problem and make this to be the best solution out there for people to use.
ReplyDelete